Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander viewers are advised that this website contains the names and images of people who have passed

Home
ccefeefe605ca1c4d948c5029f1f4d0231f8b7d3.png
Quick exit

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander viewers are advised that this website contains the names and images of people who have passed

Quick exit
Coronial_Inquest_Banner.jpg

Coronial Inquest Recommendations

When an Aboriginal person passes in custody, the Coroners Court of Victoria (CCoV) is responsible for conducting an investigation. They try to find out what happened, why, and whether anything could have been done to prevent it. Coroners can also make recommendations to prevent similar tragedies happening again.

In some cases, there have not been full inquests in Aboriginal deaths in custody. When there have been coronial inquests, the coroners recommendations are not always followed.

Our families and communities are left without real answers or justice.

The Aboriginal Justice Caucus (AJC) continue to push for the law to be changed so that there is a formal coronial inquest into all Aboriginal deaths in custody. We call for greater accountability and ongoing monitoring of what action is taken in response to these recommendations.

As part of our Looking Back project, we have gathered recommendations arising from coronial inquests into Aboriginal deaths in custody that occurred between 1991 and July 2025. Where possible, links have been drawn between RCIADIC and coronial inquest recommendations, showing just how many of those recommendations have not been acted on.

This isn’t just a record. It’s a call for action real accountability.

Search coronial recommendations
About coronial inquests
When are coronial inquests conducted?

When an Aboriginal person dies in custody, the Coroners Court of Victoria has a responsibility to investigate what happened.

Whilst all deaths in custody must be investigated, section 52(3A) Coroners Act 2008 (Vic) means that the coroner is not required to hold an inquest into a death in custody where the death was considered to be of “natural causes”. This means that when someone dies in prison or police custody, there might not be an inquest if the death was determined by a medical examiner to be unrelated.

We know though, that deaths in custody are rarely “natural”. Many deaths that occur due to so-called “natural causes” are connected to poor medical care, delayed treatment and systemic failings. These deaths are preventable, and an inquest is essential to understanding what more could have been done.

Since the introduction of Practice Direction 6 of 2020 from the Coroners Court of Victoria, coroners are required to consider RCIADIC Recommendation 11. Legal requirement for formal coronial inquest for all deaths in custody when family request an inquest into the death of their loved one. This is the case even where a death has been deemed to be of natural causes.

Before this change, seven Aboriginal men passed in custody without a formal inquest. No transparency or accountability. No understanding of what happened. No path to avoiding further tragedies of this kind in the future.

AJC continue to push for every Aboriginal death in custody to be treated with the seriousness it deserves.

Access to coronial inquest findings

Where an inquest occurs, the coroner can decide that the findings, recommendations and responses should be available online.

However, this means that not all investigations into deaths in custody are published, as only a small proportion (less than five %) of investigations are held as public inquests and not all findings are accompanied by recommendations.

Where coronial inquests are made available, they can be accessed here.

Concerns regarding this process

After the findings of an inquest are published, there is not a strong process to keep track of action that is taken. There is also no legal requirement for any action to be taken at all.

This means that even where recommendations are made, we often don’t know whether the recommendations have been fulfilled or if they have had an impact in preventing further deaths in custody.

The AJC has raised concerns over the lack of a consistent and transparent process to monitor the action taken on coronial recommendations in Victoria.

There is a need to ensure recommendations made by coroners are being addressed in full, to prevent future deaths in custody.

All Coronial Recommendations

1991 KD 1

Case study for decriminalisation of public drunkenness

There has been a great deal of discussion within the community about issues relating to alcohol use and abuse including underage drinking and the possible decriminalisation of public drunkenness. I intend to submit my Findings in this inquest to the Attorney-General for his attention with the recommendation that it be referred to the Law Reform Commission for consideration as a case study in what can go wrong in the existing legislative framework.

Alcohol and drug related harm
Aboriginal data and social indicators
Imprisonment as a last resort
Policing
Implementation and monitoring
Aboriginal organisations

2023 VN 26

Option to consult with Aboriginal Health Practitioner or Worker within 24 hours of intake into custody

I recommend that Justice Health and Correct Care Australasia and/or the Health Service Provider at Dame Phyllis Frost Centre ensure that all Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander prisoners have the option during the reception medical assessment of consulting with an Aboriginal Health Practitioner or Aboriginal Health Worker, either in person or by telehealth, within 48 hours. The prisoner’s response to this offer should be documented. An alternative to this recommendation will be implemented and implementation has commenced. Under the new health service model commencing 1 July 2023, two full-time Aboriginal Health Liaison Officers will be employed by Western Health and based at DPFC, to provide seven day a week coverage. The increased presence of Aboriginal Health Liaison Officers will enhance opportunities for Aboriginal women to engage with Aboriginal health professionals should they wish to do so. Justice Health is working with Western Health to explore rostering and on-call arrangements to maximise these opportunities. All reception medical assessments must occur within 24 hours of reception. Currently over half of all receptions into DPFC occur after 4 pm, which may present challenges for Health Service Providers to meet the 24-hour requirement and ensure an Aboriginal Health Liaison Officer is available. Justice Health will work closely with Western Health during the transition-in period, and upon service commencement, to develop alternative options where Aboriginal staff are not available within the required 24 hour-timeframe. These may include a follow-up appointment as soon as practicable. When an offer for a consultation with an Aboriginal Health Practitioner or Health Worker is made but declined, this will be noted in the prisoner’s health record. Those services will also continue to be offered.

Does something not look right?

Every effort has been made to ensure that the information used in Looking Back is accurate. However, if you've seen something you think is incorrect then we would greatly appreciate you letting us know. Contact us now to share your feedback.

Does something not look right?

We greatly appreciate you letting us know. Please get in touch.

Home
Aboriginal Justice Caucus
Contact Us

Get in touch for enquiries, feedback, complaints and compliments.

Contact Us
Quick Links

About Us


Acknowledgement of Country

We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia and pay our respect to them, their culture and their Elders past and present.

© 2025 Aboriginal Justice Caucus.

All rights reserved.

© 2025 Aboriginal Justice Caucus.

All rights reserved.